The Company Town in the Twenty-First Century

Mine workers in an 18th century company town

The Company Town in the Twenty-First Century

How big banks turned the United States into a 19th century mining town

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, miners in the Pocono Mountains and other coal-rich regions often lived in company towns, built around the site of a mine. They paid their rent to their employer, who built and owned all houses in the town, just as they bought their groceries, clothing, and other provisions from company stores.

In many cases these purchases were on credit rather than cash, taken as advance on future pay. With wages insufficient to cover expenses for food, rent, and clothing, miners received pay stubs that showed increasing negative balances. Rather than earn a living, they mounted increasing debt to their employer.

Songwriter Merle Travis, who came from a family of coal miners, turned the words of his father and brother into a 1946 song: “You load sixteen tons, what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt. Saint Peter don’t you call me cause I can’t go, I owe my soul to the company store.

In the Poconos, miners were permitted to stay in their rented homes only as long as they worked in the mine. When a miner died, his body was laid on the transom of his house as a signal to his family: They had three days to send someone else into the mine (often a son, as young as eight) or they would be evicted. Company men would carry all of the family’s possessions to the curb, carry out any living persons who would not leave, and lock the doors.

While company towns met scorn from lawmakers and faced occasional legal challenges, they mostly disappeared in the 1920s not because of any regulation but thanks to economic circumstances. As the American economy evolved, and private transportation became more affordable and accessible, workers finally had alternative options. Thanks to public investment in amenities like schools, roads, libraries, and hospitals, American workers were economically freed from the chains of their employers.

One Nation, Under Banks

Not long after the company town lost favor, American spending changed dramatically. With the introduction of credit cards in the 1950s and 1960s, shoppers no longer had to take lines of credit from individual retailers. Instead, they could borrow from a central bank and pay their balance over time—generating interest profits for the lender in the process. As American wages stagnated starting in the 1970s, consumers turned to credit to sustain their lifestyle, and lenders happily complied.

Today, credit card debt exceeds personal savings for nearly half of Americans. Savings accounts yield an interest rate barely above zero (CNN put the average at 0.06% in 2013) while banks earn an average 15.6% on credit card debt. If you lend your bank $100 for a year, they pay you 6 cents. If they lend you that same $100, they charge you $15.60. That, of course, leaves out any fees associated with either account.

Those same banks are presently holding roughly $20 billion in American assets in the form of retirement accounts, all of it locked away until we turn 65. Ask any financial expert and they’ll tell you how important it is to put money away for retirement—suggestions range from 10% to 20% of your total income.

Should you want or need to withdraw those funds before the minimum age, say to pay off crippling credit card debt, start a business, or buy a home, federal law imposes a hefty fee on top of your tax burden. Retirement accounts, incidentally, have averaged four percent interest for the last decade or so. To be fair, there is some provision for buying a home—each American can tap his or her retirement for a total of $10,000, once per lifetime, provided they are purchasing their first home.

You read that right: Ten thousand dollars. If you are an American earning the median income (roughly $44,000 a year) and putting the recommended 15 percent into a retirement account, you’ll accumulate that much in about 14 months. Everything else you’ve put away in your career is off-limits, and can’t be used to build equity or start a business.

The banks, of course, have a vested interest in retirement accounts — if you’ll forgive the pun. That $20 billion is principle they can use to lend, to play the stock market, and to concoct new complicated schemes for turning profit. They love it so much they’ve lobbied the government to turn over the Social Security Trust for them to play with.

Meanwhile, they’re instituting new maintenance fees on account holders, further cutting into that paltry four percent interest. Salon and AlterNet ran an article recently about the reality of American 401(k)s. If you’re wondering what they had to say, the headline is “401(k)s Are a Sham.”

You might be fortunate enough to earn 4% on the money you lock away in retirement savings, but the odds are your bank will leverage that capital to earn far more. Is it any wonder those “financial experts” telling us all to put 20% of our income in retirement often work for a bank?

Paying to Spend What’s Ours

So while you are locking away 20% of your income where you can’t touch it, how are you to afford things like housing and clothing and food? Well, the same bank that holds your retirement account will be happy to offer you a credit card and a mortgage to buy a home — both at a higher interest rate than you’ll earn on that retirement.

And your new house is the collateral, of course, so if you should fail to make timely payments on that mortgage, even if you’ve paid it almost all the way off, your equity will revert to the bank and you’ll be left with nothing.

Following the Great Recession, some banks took a literal approach to the company town, and became landlords. Across the country, banks like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank began renting out the homes they’d foreclosed on mere months earlier.

Want to buy a car to get back and forth to work? There’s your bank again, happy to offer you a five-figure loan, on which you’ll pay interest as high as 22 percent, depending on your home state and credit rating — plus fees, of course. While they hold 20% of the income you’ve ever earned, using it to earn huge profits and paying you minuscule interest, they’re happy to lend you some money at borderline usurious rates.

The banks have turned the entire country into a company town, and we are all living in it. You may get your food, clothing, housing, and transportation from different vendors, but you don’t pay them for it. Your bank pays the vendors, and you pay the bank—with interest.

Privatizing Social Security is hardly the only way banks want to expand their ownership over Americans. In recent decades we’ve seen lobbying efforts to make it harder for Americans to declare bankruptcy and reduce the types of debt that can be wiped out in bankruptcy filings, to pass more debt on to heirs when a person dies, and to arrest and imprison people who default on debts, effectively bringing back debtor’s prisons — which Congress abolished in 1833.

Education on the Company Dime

In yesterday’s New York Times, David Leonhardt challenged the popular belief that student loan debt is out of control by pointing out, with the help of the Brookings Institute, that massive student debt is not terribly common.

“Only 7 percent of young-adult households with education debt have $50,000 or more of it,” Leonhardt reports. “By contrast, 58 percent of such households have less than $10,000 in debt, and an additional 18 percent have between $10,000 and $20,000.”

These critics of the popular narrative suggest we pay more attention to the individuals who take on relatively small debt loads but don’t finish college, comparing them with the homeowner who defaults on the mortgage, ending up with all of the cost and none of the benefit. But by countering complaints about student debt, the authors are dismissing a small piece of a larger problem. Americans are drowning in debt, and student loans represent an increasing share.

When Elizabeth Warren points out that students are paying the federal government around 7% on their education loans while banks pay one tenth of that at 0.75%, it’s not because student loans are the whole problem. It’s because those same students, who are struggling to find decent employment, are likely also paying credit card debt, auto loans for the car they need to get to work, and either paying or looking to take on a mortgage.

Meanwhile, if they’re doing as bank-employed financial experts tell them, they are putting 10 to 20 percent of their income into a retirement account. They’ll see that money again after four decades accruing and paying off debt. That’s if they live that long, and if the money is still there—as we all saw at the end of the last decade, there’s no guarantee it will be.

In the 1890s, six thousand employees of the Pullman railroad company lived in the company town of Pullman, just outside Chicago. When the company’s products lost favor, the company laid off workers and reduced wages, but they did not lower rents in the town or the cost of any goods sold in the company store. This led to the Pullman Strike of 1894, which shut down much of the nation’s freight shipping for almost two months, and led to 30 deaths and 54 arrests. Following the Strike, a congressional panel condemned Pullman’s practices in their company town as anti-American.A little over a century later, large national banks turned the United States into a massive company town. When those banks crashed the world economy, they kicked people out of their houses and jacked up rates on credit, leading to massive national protests from groups like the Occupy movement and the Tea Party. All we are lacking right now is condemnation from the government—and with the rise of figures like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, whose messages would have been marginalized and dismissed a mere decade ago, we just might just be on the right track.

Edit 6/26/14: I’ve made a small change to the last paragraph, to remove a negative snipe at the Tea Party. As a couple of commenters pointed out, the remark reflected my opinion and was not supported by any context. I stand by my opinion of the group and its origins, but it didn’t belong in this article.

Scroll to Top